0 0
Read Time:22 Minute, 33 Second

Research Paper

Dr Hichem Karoui


The text explores the moral complexities of Western support for Israeli actions in Gaza and raises questions about the ethics and legitimacy of such support. It emphasises the need to examine the reasons behind the severe penalties imposed on the people of Gaza and calls for a comprehensive investigation into the ethics of Western endorsement. The paper thus highlights the moral implications of collective punishment and urges for a reassessment of the Western perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

1. Introduction

The moral complexities of Western patronage towards Israeli activities in Gaza raise profound and stimulating queries, resonating with questions about the legitimacy of persistent carnage and the responsibility of the 2.3 million innocent souls unjustifiably exposed to the dire realities of living under an oppressive Israeli encirclement for numerous years (Luft, 2018). This Western advocacy, rooted in the Oct 7 operations of Hamas, hints at a disconcerting concept of widespread retaliation and indubitably prompts valid apprehensions about the impartiality and ethical orientation of such manoeuvres. It beckons us to dwell on and scrutinise in depth the core question of what transgressions the 2.3 million denizens of Gaza have committed to warrant such an extraordinarily severe and unyielding penalty (Fischborn, 2017). This comprehensive investigation into the ethics of Western endorsement of Israeli actions is an attempt to shed light on the convoluted weave of reasons endorsing this patronage while rigorously weighing if it genuinely corresponds with the touchstones of justice, empathy, and humanness expected to guide our choices and actions in these precarious circumstances.

2. Historical Context

The deep rumination on the complex moral dilemmas arising from Western backing of Israeli operations in Gaza necessitates an essential investigation. It becomes crucial to encapsulate and establish connections to historical instances wherein retaliatory actions were intentionally tempered despite provocative undertakings. An evocative portrayal of this can be found in Hitler’s remarkable restraint in abstaining from unleashing retaliatory bombardments upon Paris. These correlations serve to underscore the grim reality of the 2.3 million blameless inhabitants trapped in the oppressive Israeli blockade within Gaza. As a result, disquieting uncertainties arise regarding their purported involvement in any Hamas-linked activities.

The pressing dilemma confronting us, which continuously probes the nobility of Western support for Israeli deeds, cannot be omitted (Al-Sarraj and Lubbad, 2018). To dissect this issue intricately, we must explore the deep roots of the ceaseless penalties imposed upon the already burdened citizens of Gaza. Such an enigmatic predicament generates a plethora of worries and initiates an intense wave of ethical self-examination.

Ultimately, one question remains as a menacing echo in our combined consciousness: On what moral or ethical bases do we subject an entire population to the terrors of collective punishment? (Baddorf, 2017) This deep-seated inquiry ignites the hunt for truth and comprehension, compelling us to dispute prevalent narratives and critically evaluate the defences put forth.

Indeed, this text’s elaboration bears witness to the weight and intricacy of the disputed issue. It echoes a reminder that the quest for justice and impartiality is an unceasing expedition where quandaries serve as our navigating strength, directing us towards a global society aspiring for authentic compassion and unyielding empathy (Klieman, 2020; Albzour et al., 2019; Aziz, 2023).

3. Israeli Blockade of Gaza

The blockade imposed on Gaza by Israel, persisting for an extended duration, indubitably hampers the lives of approximately 2.3 million occupants of the region (Parpia and Khawaja, 2019). Over the elapsing years, the civilian populace has faced unbroken bouts of stringent isolation, consequentially restricting access to vital resources and jeopardising survival (Dyer, 2014). In addition, constraints on their liberty of movement encase them in a perpetuating cycle of distress and upheaval. In light of such alarming circumstances, questioning the unwavering Western endorsement of Israel’s actions within these critical contexts is both vital and pressing. Detractors might claim that the blockade upholds security requirements. Yet, it is essential to delve deep into the lopsided, drastic ramifications it carries for those haplessly trapped within the conflict’s brutal crossfire. The unremitting carnage and suffering epitomised by the Gaza predicament stirs up serious inquiries touching upon Western society’s moral accountability in ratifying these relentless acts of violence (Parpia and Khawaja, 2019). Recognising that blame does not lie with the approximately 2.3 million individuals tragically caught in this horrific situation is crucial (Shafir, 2017). Rather, it prompts the pressing need for a holistic, inclusive and ethically grounded stance that directly engages with the profound complexities manifest in the Israeli-Palestinian discord. Only through a firm commitment to this approach, one championing justice, empathy, and unwavering acknowledgement of innate human rights, can we actively and passionately seek a significant, life-changing, and enduring solution to this deeply rooted and agonising crisis.

4. Hamas Operation and Western Justification

Media experts highlight ethical ramifications associated with Western nations endorsing Israeli actions in Gaza (Kwartin and Michael, 2013). This support embroils the international community in a complex maze of moral responsibility and geopolitical alliances. A critical aspect of this endorsement involves the rationalisation of Israel’s actions, especially concerning Hamas’ operations. Advocates posit that Israel’s incessant and seemingly excessive military response stems from the continuous threats and antagonism orchestrated by Hamas (Luft, 2018). Amid these assertions, it becomes crucial to question to what degree the blameless 2.3 million inhabitants of Gaza are accountable or implicated in these violent and disruptive operations.

The ethics surrounding the Western endorsement come under rigorous examination when pondering whether the enduring atrocities and incalculable hardships experienced by Gaza’s citizens are genuinely justifiable. Furthermore, it raises the question of the legitimacy and honour of maintaining steadfast support for such actions.

Understanding this ethical conundrum in its entirety demands a deep immersion into the motivations behind Western backing, coupled with a detailed dissection of blame attributed to Gaza residents. By uncovering the origins of this endorsement, one can better comprehend its ethical repercussions and decipher the true nature of this complex and controversial condition. Such introspection and reflection are critical to appreciating the total weight of the issue and striving for a global landscape characterised by enhanced justice and compassion (Alshurafa, 2021).

5. The Role of the 2.3 million People in Gaza

The considerable population of 2.3 million inhabitants dwelling within the borders of Gaza cannot be merely glossed over while examining the ethics of Western endorsement harboured for Israeli initiatives. These individuals, occupying a prominent and conspicuous part in this intricate geopolitical matrix, have suffered the intense ramifications of enduring the protracted Israeli siege. This reality has spanned across a significant time frame. Their prolonged encounter with such trying circumstances has necessitated their facing innumerable challenges while their capacity to secure even the most essential provisions for survival and sustenance is stringently curbed. Within the context of these extraordinary conditions, it becomes incumbent upon us to initiate pertinent inquiries focusing on the plausible participation of this immense populace in the disputed Hamas operation that is utilised by the Western powers as a moral bedrock for the continued massacre (Dorsey, 2016).

The enthusiastic endorsement and promotion of Israeli strategies of vast retaliatory measures, fervorous in their nature, by Western countries, inexorably leads to profound moral dilemmas, more so when one considers the exceedingly extensive collective affliction that is compelled upon innocent civilians as an immediate outcome of these actions (Nichols and Mallon, 2006). As Western nations resolutely render their unwavering backing to Israeli military ventures, it becomes essential to determine the exact transgression or pressing rationale that could conceivably justify this grievously severe and inhuman punishment that is being doled out to these ordinary individuals who fundamentally constitute the structural support underpinning Gaza society (Luke et al., 2021).

It stands as an undeniable fact that the people of Gaza, entrapped within the merciless boundaries of a relentless siege, are subjected to a life of indescribable suffering and hopelessness (First, 2015). Their struggles and sacrifices should not be trivialised nor dismissed as mere inadvertent fallout in a volatile conflict (Sen, 2020). Recognising their numbers’ magnitude and their suffering’s severity is crucial (Abu-Sittah, 2020). The Western backing lavished upon the Israeli actions calls for critical examination, with deep introspection, as the existence and potential of millions hang precariously in the balance.

The contrast between the rhetoric of Western powers on human rights and the grim reality faced by the people of Gaza is striking (Elessi et al., 2019). How can the alleged values and principles be reconciled with the evident suffering and deprivation suffered by an entire demographic? The viability of such an ethically troubling stance is dubious at best, as it unveils a stark double standard in the treatment of innocent civilians. The international community has a responsibility to demand transparency and justice for the embattled residents of Gaza.

In our pursuit of answers, it is vital to challenge the narratives echoed by Western nations and scrutinise the real motivations that underpin their steadying endorsement of Israeli military operations. Are undisclosed intents at work here? Is the geopolitical stake overshadowing the woes of the innocent? As we probe into the crux of this issue, we must understand that the average civilians of Gaza, the foundation of their community, are shouldering the impact of a conflict they didn’t instigate (Smith, 2015).

To truly grasp the ethical implications of Western support for Israeli activities, it’s crucial to elevate the voices of those bearing the brunt – the men, women and children of Gaza. They should be accorded space to narrate their haunting tales, aspirations, and yearnings. We can lay the groundwork for a just, empathetic world by acknowledging their struggle and expressing solidarity (Myuhtar-May, 2014).

Silence and indifference have overstayed their welcome. The residents of Gaza cannot be ignored or written off. Their stories demand our acknowledgement, our understanding, and our relentless advocacy. Only through sustained engagement and a relentless pursuit of truth and justice can we heal the inflicted injuries on the innocent and aspire towards a future where human rights for all is not just a lofty ideal but a tenable reality.

6. Western Support for Israeli Actions

The support of the West for Israeli measures in Gaza incites pressing debates on the ethics, morality, and rationale that underline this support (Johns and Davies, 2017). Israel’s prolonged blockade, which affected the lives of 2.3 million inhabitants in Gaza, gives rise to undeniable immense anguish. The events of October 7th, especially the Hamas operation, have been the focal point of Western rationale in supporting Israeli actions (Huffman and Pratt, 2017). However, it remains vague how an entire populace can bear such adverse effects due to the actions of a few (Hadad, 2019).

The idea of collective vengeance, conspicuous in this situation, undeniably brings discerning reflections on the morality of the entire predicament to the surface. The unwavering Western backing for Israeli actions in Gaza raises an essential question – what valid reasons (Kim, 2014) warrant such punitive measures on the guiltless Gaza populace? With this in mind, it becomes crucial to investigate the driving forces, political undercurrents and moral dilemmas that characterise the provocative stance of the Western powers.

In examining the many facets of this issue, it is paramount to consider the historical context that colours the present situation. We must remember that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has historical layers imbued with political ambiguities, cultural intricacies, and religious complexities. The quest for self-identity, territorial disputes, and the existence of contrasting narratives further complicate peaceful resolutions (Johns and Davies, 2017). The unwavering support of the Western world for Israel could be an echo of their geopolitical interests, historical affiliations, and shared ideologies. However, such support opportunities critical ethical debates regarding the preference of national interests over the fundamental rights and welfare of the Palestinian populace.

Further, the persistent suffering of the Palestinian people under the Israeli lockdown emphasises the issue of communal punishment. It is categorically unfair to hold an entire community responsible for the actions of a handful. The punitive measures far exceed the objectives of deterrence or protection, raising doubts about the philosophy of proportionality (Mallory and Wallace, 2015). Moreover, the situation is worsened by damning proof that the lockdown has led to a humanitarian crisis, blocking access to essential resources such as food, water, health services, and education.

The ethical pitfall associated with the Western support of Israeli actions in Gaza transcends immediate humanitarian concerns as it sparks significant inquiries about the tenets of justice, equity, and human rights (Kühne et al., 2015). Is it reasonable to prioritise national interests and historical affiliations over the principles inscribed in international law? How can the global community ensure responsibility for human rights violations while grappling with the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Robust investigation and introspection are needed to address these compelling issues (Pilecki and Hammack, 2014).

Looking ahead, the West needs to reassess its perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Fischer, 2020). A holistic understanding of this conflict’s historical, cultural, and political aspects will enable the formulation of a fair, equitable strategy that acknowledges the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians and encourages dialogue and compromise (Javadikouchaksaraei et al., 2015). The international community must enable an environment that facilitates meaningful peace discussions, ensuring transparency and inclusivity.

In summary, the moral principles governing Western support for Israeli actions in Gaza are intricate and require circumspection. The continued suffering of the Palestinian people and the notion of collective punishment place an onus on the international community to re-evaluate this support. By scrutinising the driving force, political implications, and ethical dilemmas and through transparent conversations, mutual understanding and adherence to international law, we can strive to foster fairness and justice in the global community and ultimately find a lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ( AbuMezied and Sawafta, 2022; Aziz, 2023).

7. The Ethics of Mass Revenge

The labyrinthine subtleties and profound implications that accompany the deeply contested subject of collective punishment, particularly within the context of Western affirmation of Israeli acts in the beleaguered Gaza region, spark a cascade of pressing investigations that cry out for our attention (Cramwinckel et al., 2015). These investigations probe the moral underpinnings of this relentless spectacle of violence, compelling us to wrestle with the ethical scenarios that present themselves in numerous ways.

Within the grim reality that engulfs Gaza, home to a whopping 2.3 million people ensnared in the ruthlessly enforced deadlock imposed by Israel, the exploration of ethicality proves exceptionally multi-faceted and convoluted (Campbell et al., 2016). It necessitates a rigorous dissection and analysis to ascertain whether it is ethically defensible to lay the bulk of blame upon the entirety of Gaza’s citizens for the infractions committed solely by a minority, with the justification for ongoing bloodshed ostensibly predicated on the activities of Hamas (Jacobs , 2018).

To fully fathom the breadth of Western endorsement for such punitive measures enacted by Israel, it becomes crucial to launch a painstaking probe into the latent drivers that fuel and warrant such support (Batson and Thompson, 2001). This investigation is needed to comprehend the complicated workings of Western nations’ reinforcement and absolution of Israel’s Gaza activities and also to illuminate the driving forces and dynamics that uphold this staunch alliance.

Ultimately, these elaborate moral quandaries undeniably nudge us to scrutinise the integrity and objectivity implicitly associated with the Western endorsement of Israeli actions within Gaza. They invite a profound introspective look at the ethical dimensions and reverberations inherent in this highly nuanced and consequential matter. We can only aspire for a broader understanding and potential resolution of this deeply entrenched conflict through such a holistic examination.

8. Examining the Reasons for Punishment

Exploring the intricate and comprehensive reasons behind the sanctions demands profound analysis and assessment of specific actions and circumstances that have sadly resulted in the continuous, devastating loss of myriad lives in the embattled area of the Gaza Strip. Amid this melancholic investigation, it becomes crucial to ascertain with precision whether the 2.3 million enduring inhabitants who bravely resist the Israeli encumbrance bear any culpability or association in the strategically planned operations put into motion by Hamas, which purportedly serve as the reasons for the consequential retaliation (Hirsh et al., 2018).

Moreover, it’s critical to consider the unwavering support extended by Western countries towards their Israeli equivalents. This endorsement provokes a host of ethical dilemmas that require us to scrutinise the legitimacy of administering such stringent collective penalties upon an entire populace (Yoder and Decety, 2020). Only a detailed understanding of the nuanced motives behind these punitive measures can allow a sincere evaluation of Western assistance’s moral stance and righteousness in this intricate, protracted conflict (Batson and Thompson, 2001).

By questioning these provocative justifications, our goal is to unravel the mystique surrounding the principles seemingly guiding Western favouritism for Israeli retribution and to bring to light the various aspects that have been instrumental in shaping this complex dynamic. We endeavour to extend our understanding by thoroughly examining these intertwined factors, patterns, and dynamics, thereby cultivating a broader, nuanced comprehension of the complicated nexus of interests in this persistent, contentious clash (Karoui, 2023).

9. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is absolutely and undeniably crucial to extensively and meticulously scrutinise the ethics, principles, and values surrounding the contentious Western support, both overt and covert, for Israeli actions, manoeuvres, and operations in the fiercely disputed and conflict-ridden Gaza region (Karoui, 2023). The continuous and incessant loss of precious lives, innocent civilians as well as combatants, and the relentless, unyielding blockade mercilessly imposed upon the Gazan population, effectively inflicting and subjecting them to unimaginable and indescribable levels of unbearable and unendurable suffering, pain, and hardship, all serve as blatant and compelling evidence that inevitably gives rise to not only profound, deep-seated, and pervasive but also legitimate and justified doubts, uncertainties, and reservations regarding the inherent morality, righteousness, and justifiability of the aforementioned Western support. As we delve deeper into this thought-provoking and controversial topic, it becomes increasingly apparent and evident that while the purported and professed justification, rationale, and reasoning for Israeli actions may ostensibly and ostensibly lay in the formidable security threats due to Zionist occupation of Palestinian territories, reaction to the relentless Israeli colonisation undertaken by Hamas, the Gaza-based National Liberation organisation, it is, without a shadow of a doubt, absolutely and unreservedly imperative, urgent, and essential to unreservedly and thoroughly ponder, contemplate, and ruminate upon the critical and crucial question of the culpability, responsibility, and involvement of the entire Palestinian population, the men, women, and innocent children, residing within the confines and boundaries of Gaza. Moreover, it is of utmost and paramount importance to emphasise and underscore that the enactment, implementation, and perpetuation of Western support to the Israeli aggression and colonisation, unwavering and steadfast for the Israeli retaliatory, punitive, and coercive measures, strategies, and steps undertaken and enacted in response and reaction to the Palestinian National Liberation Movement, Hamas, and other affiliated militant groups further exasperate, compound, and intensify the already daunting, intricate, and multifaceted complexity, intricacy, and intricateness of the situation, predicament, and conundrum. Consequently, these profound, intellectual, and philosophical contemplations, reflections, and musings imposed by such a polarising and divisive issue directly, overtly, and explicitly challenge, question, and interrogate the moral integrity, ethical standing, and humanitarian credentials of Western engagement, involvement, and entanglement in the prolonged and intractable Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, compelling and necessitating an urgent, comprehensive, and exhaustive examination, evaluation, and exploration of the far-reaching, wide-ranging, and consequential impacts, implications, and outcomes that are unequivocally and irrefutably engendered, brought about, and triggered by this unwavering and unyielding political and financial support and military assistance.



Abu-Sittah, Ghassan. 2020. “The Virus, the Settler, and the Siege: Gaza in the Age of Corona.” Journal of Palestine Studies 49 (4): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2020.49.4.65.

Albzour, Mai, Sandra Penic, Randa Nasser, and Eva GT Green. “Support for” normalisation” of relations between Palestinians and Israelis, and how it relates to contact and resistance in the West Bank.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 7, no. 2 (2019): 978-996.

Alshurafa, M. “Identity construction and felt-accountability of Palestinian and Israeli human rights activists: the case of the Gaza Strip.” (2021)

AbuMezied, A. and Sawafta, M. “Analysing care policies and practices in times of austerity and conflict: the case of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT).” Gender & Development (2022).

Aziz, S. “… Rights Violations in Gaza: A qualitative analysis of the UN’s responsibility under the principle of R2P to combat the violations of articles 3 & 13 of the UDHR in Gaza.” (2023).

Baddorf, Matthew. 2016. “Phenomenal Consciousness, Collective Mentality, and Collective Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 174 (11): 2769–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0809-x.

Batson, C. Daniel, and Elizabeth R. Thompson. 2001. “Why Don’t Moral People Act Morally? Motivational Considerations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (2): 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00114.

Campbell, Stephen M., Connie M. Ulrich, and Christine Grady. 2016. “A Broader Understanding of Moral Distress.” The American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1239782.

Cramwinckel, Florien M, Kees van den Bos, and Eric van Dijk. 2015. “Reactions to Morally Motivated Deviance.” Current Opinion in Psychology 6 (December 2015): 150–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.007.

Dorsey, Dale. 2016. “Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry.” Ethics 126 (3): 747–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/684710.

Dyer O.         Rebuilding health services in Gaza won’t be possible while Israel maintains blockade, says report          BMJ  2014;  349 :g6644         doi:10.1136/bmj.g6644

Elessi, Khamis, Abdullah Aljamal, and Loai Albaraqouni. 2019. “Effects of the 10-Year Siege Coupled with Repeated Wars on the Psychological Health and Quality of Life of University Students in the Gaza Strip: A Descriptive Study.” The Lancet 393 (Special Issue S10): S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30596-3.

First, Elsa. 2015. “Siege: Marwan and Sahar, Four Years after the 2009 Gaza War.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 35 (7): 733–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2015.1074816.

Fischborn, M. Questions for a Science of Moral Responsibility. Rev.Phil.Psych. 9, 381–394 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0360-5

Fischer, Nina. 2020. “Entangled Suffering and Disruptive Empathy: The Holocaust, the Nakba and the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict in Susan Abulhawa’s Mornings in Jenin.” Memory Studies 15 (4): 175069801989685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698019896850.

Hirsh, Jacob B., Jackson G. Lu, and Adam D. Galinsky. 2018. “Moral Utility Theory: Understanding the Motivation to Behave (Un)Ethically.” Research in Organizational Behavior 38 (November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002.

Huffman, G., Pratt, J. The action effect: Support for the biased competition hypothesis.                    Atten Percept Psychophys 79, 1804–1815 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1343-4

Jacobs, Jonathan. 2018. “Punitiveness: A Philosophical Perspective.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 31 (7): 088740341875546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418755463.

Javadikouchaksaraei, Mehrzad, Mohammad Reevany Bustami, Azeem Fazwan Ahmad Farouk, and Ali Akbar Ramazaniandarzi. 2015. “Reinterpreting the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Constructivism Theory of Understanding a Cross-Ethnic Phenomena.” Asian Social Science 11 (16). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n16p107.

Johns, Robert, and Graeme A. M. Davies. 2017. “Civilian Casualties and Public Support for Military Action: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (1): 251–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717729733

Karahan, Hatice, and Hatice Karahan. “Solidarity with Palestinian People.” The Quest for a New International Aid Architecture: The Turkish Experience (2020): 83-107.

Karoui, Hichem. The Right to Resist: Zionism and Fascism. GEW Reports & Analyses Collection: Resistances. (2023).

Klieman, A. “… Two-State Solution to One-State Reality; Understanding Israel: Political, Societal and Security Challenges; Preventing Palestine: A Political History from Camp David ….” (2020).

Kim, D. (2014). Affect and Public Support for Military Action. SAGE Open, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014560530

Kühne, Rinaldo, Patrick Weber, and Katharina Sommer. 2015. “Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures.” Journal of Communication 65 (2): 259–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12151.

Kwartin, Ilana, and Kobi Michael. 2013. “Declaration of War – between a Ceremony and a Strategy: The Case of Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip.” Journal of Politics and Law 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v6n3p198.

Luft, Michal. “Living in a Legal Vacuum: The Case of Israel’s Legal Position and Policy towards Gaza Residents.” Israel Law Review 51, no. 2 (2018): 193-234. doi:10.1017/S0021223718000110.

Luke, Dillon M., Craig S. Neumann, and Bertram Gawronski. 2021. “Psychopathy and Moral-Dilemma Judgment: An Analysis Using the Four-Factor Model of Psychopathy and the CNI Model of Moral Decision-Making.” Clinical Psychological Science 10 (2): 216770262110438. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211043862.

Mallory, Conall, and Stuart Wallace. 2015. “The ‘Deterrent Argument’ and the Responsibility to Protect.” The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (8): 1213–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1082836.

Myuhtar-May, Fatme. 2014. “Identity, Nationalism, and Cultural Heritage under Siege: Five Narratives of Pomak Heritage — from Forced Renaming to Weddings.” Brill.com. Brill. April 17, 2014. https://brill.com/display/title/22735.

Nichols, Shaun, and Ron Mallon. 2006. “Moral Dilemmas and Moral Rules.” Cognition 100 (3): 530–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.005.

Ofir Hadad                                    (2021)                                    A Battle of Names: Hamas and Israeli Operations in the Gaza Strip,                                    Terrorism and Political Violence,                                    33:5,                                        931-950,                                    DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2019.1594789

Parpia, Alyssa S, and Marwan Khawaja. 2019. “The Impact of Damage to Buildings on Displacement during the 2014 Israel–Gaza War: A Propensity Score Matching Study.” The Lancet 393 (March 2019): S39–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30625-7.

Pilecki, Andrew, and Phillip L. Hammack. 2013. “‘Victims’ versus ‘Righteous Victims’: The Rhetorical Construction of Social Categories in Historical Dialogue among Israeli and Palestinian Youth.” Political Psychology 35 (6): 813–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12063.

Sen, Somdeep. 2020. “The Pandemic under Siege: A View from the Gaza Strip.” World Development 135 (November 2020): 105063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105063.

Shafir, Gershon. A Half Century of Occupation: Israel, Palestine, and the World’s Most Intractable Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520966734

Smith, Ron J. 2015. “Healthcare under Siege: Geopolitics of Medical Service Provision in the Gaza Strip.” Social Science & Medicine 146 (December 2015): 332–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.018.

  1. F. Al-Sarraj and H. M. Lubbad, “Bias Detection of Palestinian/Israeli Conflict in Western Media: A Sentiment Analysis Experimental Study,” 2018 International Conference on Promising Electronic Technologies (ICPET), Deir El-Balah, Palestine, 2018, pp. 98-103, doi: 10.1109/ICPET.2018.00024.

Yoder, Keith J., and Jean Decety. 2019. “Conflicting Influences of Justice Motivations on Moral Judgments.” Cognition and Emotion 34 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1669536.









0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %